The Dark Knight Rises (2012) 1080p 5.1 BrRip x264 - Judas
- Type:
- Video > HD - Movies
- Files:
- 3
- Size:
- 2.92 GB
- Info:
- IMDB
- Spoken language(s):
- English
- Texted language(s):
- English
- Tag(s):
- The Dark Knight Rises Dark Knight Knight Rises Batman 2012 Judas mp4 x264 aac 1080p 5.1 bluray bdrip brrip
- Uploaded:
- Jan 30, 2013
- By:
- dhjudasx
- Seeders:
- 260
- Leechers:
- 54
- Comments:
- 22
The Dark Knight Rises [FORMAT]:........[ MP4 x264 VBR 2,250 kb/s [FILE SIZE]:.....[ 2.91GB [RESOLUTION]:....[ 1920x1080 [FRAME RATE]:....[ 23.976 fps [AUDIO STREAM 1]:[ AAC 2.0 Stereo 96 kb/s [AUDIO STREAM 2]:[ AAC 5.1 Surround 192 kb/s [LANGUAGE]:......[ English [SUBTITLES]:.....[ English (SRT File) [RUNTIME]:.......[ 2Hr 45Min [SOURCE].........[ 1080p Physical Blu-ray Compliant with Xbox360/PS3/iPads/Mobile Devices/etc. devices that require the primary Audio stream to be AAC Stereo (many do not accept/work with AAC 5.1 format). Audio Stream 2 available to those that also wish to experience great 5.1 sound that goes right alongside great picture quality. For those experiencing LOW VOLUME issues, try to playback the 2nd Audio stream in stereo mode, this should improve audio quality and increase the volume substantially. If you wish to experience 5.1 audio on the original PS3 or Newer PS3, Just select the audio options and ensure the 5.1 stream/track is selected. PC Users will have to use something like VLC that allows you to choose the 2nd Audio stream/track, Depending on your configuration, vlc should automatically enable 5.1 playback after the track change, but double check by selecting AUDIO ~ Audio Device ~ 5.1 Screenshot Previews: http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/1130/vlcsnap2013013011h26m34.png http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/6204/vlcsnap2013013011h26m47.png http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/1770/vlcsnap2013013011h29m49.png http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/7459/vlcsnap2013013011h30m16.png http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/9398/vlcsnap2013013011h31m15.png http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/7108/vlcsnap2013013011h33m55.png http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/4035/vlcsnap2013013011h35m11.png http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9182/vlcsnap2013013011h35m42.png http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/7281/vlcsnap2013013011h36m55.png http://img542.imageshack.us/img542/4068/vlcsnap2013013011h39m58.png http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/1451/vlcsnap2013013011h41m03.png http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/9310/vlcsnap2013013011h41m14.png http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/8819/vlcsnap2013013011h41m32.png Please, be patient with seeding... Enjoy ;) Feel free to leave a + vote and a comment, Thank You! Judas's Note: YES, this is the IMAX one, there are portions of the film that uses the imax 75mm film and some parts that use the widescreen standard film. So don't flip a table over seeing the movie transition from one to the next, it's no different than what you'd see playing back the bluray.
Thanks ! Good to see the I max scenes haven't been cropped out!
dhjudasx at 2013-01-31 16:58 CET:
looks like we have a troll over here that doesn't understand the concept of high level advancements in compression technology.
libertycity here thinks that the only way to have quality video is to ensure that it always grows larger, meaning with 4k now available, that i suppose he/she thinks we'll have 200gb bluray source files rather than the near 50gb.
Right?
libertycity
Take a peek at the screens? no? yes? Maybe you should try a download or 2.
Of course there is going to be some compression, any idiot could deduce that a 25:1 compresion ratio HAS to have some kind of impact. But then it depends on how well the compression is acomplished.
Even i do not have the bandwidth to download 5+gb blurays to watch... i don't... i'd be waiting a week or more. I won't even consider a source bluray.. cause that would take me approximately a month to get.
Plus who has the storage space to archive all the movies they may wish to have on hand.... 100 Blurays is appoximately 5TB of require storage if it were a raw source.
Lastly, there are encodes all over the place.. 720p and 1080p.. with higher bitrates that look absalutely terrible in comparison to this. My encodes would on the avergage machine takes well over 2 days to complete or significantly more. I don't do fast encodes.. that turns out garbage results.
Your entitled to your opinion... but by your statement, you went solely based on "size = small = must be crap". Doesn't sound like you even bother to download and see.
Again have a look at the screenshots... i'm sure they scream "crap" specially considering a Still image from a movie NEVER looks as good as the 23.976fps you get while watching it that significantly improves the overall image quality further.
libertycity here thinks that the only way to have quality video is to ensure that it always grows larger, meaning with 4k now available, that i suppose he/she thinks we'll have 200gb bluray source files rather than the near 50gb.
Right?
libertycity
Take a peek at the screens? no? yes? Maybe you should try a download or 2.
Of course there is going to be some compression, any idiot could deduce that a 25:1 compresion ratio HAS to have some kind of impact. But then it depends on how well the compression is acomplished.
Even i do not have the bandwidth to download 5+gb blurays to watch... i don't... i'd be waiting a week or more. I won't even consider a source bluray.. cause that would take me approximately a month to get.
Plus who has the storage space to archive all the movies they may wish to have on hand.... 100 Blurays is appoximately 5TB of require storage if it were a raw source.
Lastly, there are encodes all over the place.. 720p and 1080p.. with higher bitrates that look absalutely terrible in comparison to this. My encodes would on the avergage machine takes well over 2 days to complete or significantly more. I don't do fast encodes.. that turns out garbage results.
Your entitled to your opinion... but by your statement, you went solely based on "size = small = must be crap". Doesn't sound like you even bother to download and see.
Again have a look at the screenshots... i'm sure they scream "crap" specially considering a Still image from a movie NEVER looks as good as the 23.976fps you get while watching it that significantly improves the overall image quality further.
dhjudasx at 2013-01-31 22:41 CET:
See boys and girls, libertycity is a prime example of opening ones trap without knowing anything really.
Here we go: (quoteing)
QUOTE:- I don't care about download >40GB of a bluray source, this movie deserves!!
Anything hugely significant that "deserves" something... anything.. would be to go out and buy the bluray. Higher bitrate or not, that's your choice no doubt... but seriously.. there is utterly no reason to call something total crap specially when it's quite apparent that you haven't even played the video back... remember you cast the first stone, i'm simply just defending and attempting to educate rather than counter attack... take it as you please.
QUOTE:- If you want save storage space is ok, I wont, also not everybody save all movies in their hdd's...
Of course not, but a lot of people save them to blank DVDs or flash drives and so forth. PLENTY love to slap them on inexpensive USB external Hardrives so they can turn around and plug it into their tvs.. LOTS love to slap them on their mobile devices and watch them on the go. Your not going to fair well with 5-10gb or larger files for a single movie... Most of the people i do know that download movies, provided that they can, will archive them and keep them on the machine, HD space being their limiting factor when they have to start deciding which movies to keep and which to dump.
QUOTE- fps rate is pure shit, not even 30fps? wtf? calm scenes are ok but movement scenes are really CHOPPY, I hate it.
Among EVERYTHING you said, this is by the most unintelligent thing of them all. You clearly do not understand or comprehend encoding, movies, film or anything regarding standards and formats, ntsc and pal.
Heres a bit of an education since you've clearly not bothered to ask the question "why" and then formed a method in which to maybe use this quick little tool we have called "google" to find out why. All blurays default format is actually 23.976fps (3 additional decimal places removed because really we don't have to be the detailed specific do we?) This is what the films are original filmed at, this is how they were ment to be viewed, when you go to a theater that's what they look like and run at. Unless you recently visited a theater that had The Hobbit at 48fps (which i'm hoping you realize is double the standard frame rate). When you playback a bluray or most dvds for that matter on a ntsc tv (north american most and western asian markets) by default the common standard was 29.97fps (30fps) with a pulldown, this means it basically tries to take the 24fps film and actually "create" a studder in the film by adding additional frames to meet the 30fps requirement. Pal is 25fps, meaning that the pulldown is less significant but it's still not that great. Newer tvs have a 24hz mode, this allows for a 1:1 frame rate meaning PERFECT playback for bluray or dvd content that is natively 23.976fps. This gives better picture quality, better more fluent motion and so forth.
Additionally the benefit of using 23.976fps is that at the SAME bitrate as what would be used for 25 or 30fps encoded material, you get a significantly BETTER image quality.. smoother results and smaller file size due to less wasted material/bitrates dumped into unnecessary wasted frames.
Essentially with that single statement you made, you royally stuffed your own foot in your mouth without realizing it, it's makes you appear quite silly.
QUOTE:- screens looks great for this bitrate, but could be better with more bitrate.
At what point does the majority determine "what is better"... when does it end... If i had my way i would crank the bitrate straight to make it so that each individual pixel on every single frame of the entire movie was 100% accurate and every gradient was totally impossible to tell the difference between the raw bluray an the encoded one. So where do we stop?
Also there is this thing called Diminishing returns. At a certain point the compression level exceeds it's capabilities seriously hampering video/image quality in order to meet the size/bitrate requirements. But thi
Here we go: (quoteing)
QUOTE:- I don't care about download >40GB of a bluray source, this movie deserves!!
Anything hugely significant that "deserves" something... anything.. would be to go out and buy the bluray. Higher bitrate or not, that's your choice no doubt... but seriously.. there is utterly no reason to call something total crap specially when it's quite apparent that you haven't even played the video back... remember you cast the first stone, i'm simply just defending and attempting to educate rather than counter attack... take it as you please.
QUOTE:- If you want save storage space is ok, I wont, also not everybody save all movies in their hdd's...
Of course not, but a lot of people save them to blank DVDs or flash drives and so forth. PLENTY love to slap them on inexpensive USB external Hardrives so they can turn around and plug it into their tvs.. LOTS love to slap them on their mobile devices and watch them on the go. Your not going to fair well with 5-10gb or larger files for a single movie... Most of the people i do know that download movies, provided that they can, will archive them and keep them on the machine, HD space being their limiting factor when they have to start deciding which movies to keep and which to dump.
QUOTE- fps rate is pure shit, not even 30fps? wtf? calm scenes are ok but movement scenes are really CHOPPY, I hate it.
Among EVERYTHING you said, this is by the most unintelligent thing of them all. You clearly do not understand or comprehend encoding, movies, film or anything regarding standards and formats, ntsc and pal.
Heres a bit of an education since you've clearly not bothered to ask the question "why" and then formed a method in which to maybe use this quick little tool we have called "google" to find out why. All blurays default format is actually 23.976fps (3 additional decimal places removed because really we don't have to be the detailed specific do we?) This is what the films are original filmed at, this is how they were ment to be viewed, when you go to a theater that's what they look like and run at. Unless you recently visited a theater that had The Hobbit at 48fps (which i'm hoping you realize is double the standard frame rate). When you playback a bluray or most dvds for that matter on a ntsc tv (north american most and western asian markets) by default the common standard was 29.97fps (30fps) with a pulldown, this means it basically tries to take the 24fps film and actually "create" a studder in the film by adding additional frames to meet the 30fps requirement. Pal is 25fps, meaning that the pulldown is less significant but it's still not that great. Newer tvs have a 24hz mode, this allows for a 1:1 frame rate meaning PERFECT playback for bluray or dvd content that is natively 23.976fps. This gives better picture quality, better more fluent motion and so forth.
Additionally the benefit of using 23.976fps is that at the SAME bitrate as what would be used for 25 or 30fps encoded material, you get a significantly BETTER image quality.. smoother results and smaller file size due to less wasted material/bitrates dumped into unnecessary wasted frames.
Essentially with that single statement you made, you royally stuffed your own foot in your mouth without realizing it, it's makes you appear quite silly.
QUOTE:- screens looks great for this bitrate, but could be better with more bitrate.
At what point does the majority determine "what is better"... when does it end... If i had my way i would crank the bitrate straight to make it so that each individual pixel on every single frame of the entire movie was 100% accurate and every gradient was totally impossible to tell the difference between the raw bluray an the encoded one. So where do we stop?
Also there is this thing called Diminishing returns. At a certain point the compression level exceeds it's capabilities seriously hampering video/image quality in order to meet the size/bitrate requirements. But thi
dhjudasx at 2013-01-31 22:54 CET:
unfortunately my lengthy responce was diced due to character count.
Long story short.. and i'm not going to take the time to retype the rest of the responce again... the main concern was mentioned in the post however regarding the FPS "alarm" you had.
Long story short.. and i'm not going to take the time to retype the rest of the responce again... the main concern was mentioned in the post however regarding the FPS "alarm" you had.
Hey! @dhjudasx You're awesome man. These are some pretty damn good copies. Keep doing what you're doing! Looking forward to more kick ass material.
dhjudasx at 2013-02-01 16:20 CET:
If your attempting to "encode" a bluray at anything other than 23.976fps... your wasting time.. you introducing "choppyness/stuttering/uneven frames" and wasting space.
yes bluray and movie theaters are that...
Plus running 60hz/120hz which 99% of the displays run, 23.976fps fits into perfectly giving a perfect experience.
Now if you want smoothing, use powerdvd with the image interpolation enhancements that double the framerate to 48fps... granted need a computer with the power to do it... but it is about the only way to do it "properly" short of the original film being 48fps or higher which it is not.
I suspect that The Hobbit will only launch as a 23.976fps bluray. Doubt we'll see a 48fps version on bluray anytime soon.
yes bluray and movie theaters are that...
Plus running 60hz/120hz which 99% of the displays run, 23.976fps fits into perfectly giving a perfect experience.
Now if you want smoothing, use powerdvd with the image interpolation enhancements that double the framerate to 48fps... granted need a computer with the power to do it... but it is about the only way to do it "properly" short of the original film being 48fps or higher which it is not.
I suspect that The Hobbit will only launch as a 23.976fps bluray. Doubt we'll see a 48fps version on bluray anytime soon.
Plenty of up loaders doing big sizes...not everyone wants to dl some 40gig monster! I try not to dl anything bigger than 4.36 gb single DVD even though I store most movies on external hds
Hey fucker libertycity...are u stoned or what?Why are you trolling here..If u want a full size blu rays gtfo of here and buy them.Judas's prints are awesome.
dhjudasx at 2013-02-02 08:58 CET:
whoa whoa whoa lol... no need to attack anyone here... what was said is said..... nothing to see here.. moving along now... ;)
@Judas, nevermind that @libertycity all he do is complain. If @libertycity still complains about the quality of your movies, then he must buy a blu ray disc in stores. So for you @libertycity stop complaining, crying about the encodes of @Judas, just be thankful that there's someone doing this for "FREE". If not, DON'T download it! easy as that, we are not forcing you to do it.
@Judas, just remember "No matter where you go in life, there's always gonna be the one person that wants to bring you down, so stay strong and face your problems, instead of running away."
friendly quote here, #1 supporter here. @Judas! cheers! ;)
A - 100
V - 100
M - 100
@Judas, just remember "No matter where you go in life, there's always gonna be the one person that wants to bring you down, so stay strong and face your problems, instead of running away."
friendly quote here, #1 supporter here. @Judas! cheers! ;)
A - 100
V - 100
M - 100
libertycity: another crapper who doesn't understand the meaning of words like 23.976fps, compatability rips for Xbox360/PS3/iPads/Mobile Devices. and yet calls the IMAX scenes should be in 60fps when the it was originally shot in 23.976. Dear god pls help the pirate world. btw Judy mate, fab rip.. Kudos. Thank u for the trilogy :)
5.1-channel audio is fake
While it is true that there are six channels, but after a separate analysis showed that only the left and right channels are sound, the other four channels are empty.
Hope to fix the error.
While it is true that there are six channels, but after a separate analysis showed that only the left and right channels are sound, the other four channels are empty.
Hope to fix the error.
dhjudasx at 2013-02-13 21:18 CET:
might want to actually check it...
The 4 other channels have seperate audio.. I always double check it.
Keep in mind that AAC5.1 uses a backward capability in it's header so that depending on the program your trying to use to "analyze it" will initially see it as a file with only sound from 2 channels.... The 5.1 tag has to be triggered/enabled for it to redistribute the to the original channels.
Please look up AAC5.1 and do a little research on it.
The 4 other channels have seperate audio.. I always double check it.
Keep in mind that AAC5.1 uses a backward capability in it's header so that depending on the program your trying to use to "analyze it" will initially see it as a file with only sound from 2 channels.... The 5.1 tag has to be triggered/enabled for it to redistribute the to the original channels.
Please look up AAC5.1 and do a little research on it.
Thanks dhjudasx... great 1080p rips!! yeah i'm 1 of your fans... i download almost your rips... i have a little issue here... but it's not about the quality of the scenes.. it's bout the audio... it's only stereo.. the other rips works with 5.1 channel...
Thanks so much Judas, not only for the effort you put into another great upload but also the insightful and intelligent argument you put forth. I was both amused and educated =D
Thanks for the upload, hoping that this one come with sound. every other download of this movie that i've tried has no sound to it. But looks good for far.
very gud job bro keep it up
FANTASTIC quality, thanks for the upload. Seeding
dhjudasx at 2013-03-25 18:26 CET:
I've not been able to confirm a really strange error with this mp4... How it happened I don't know... but i'll be re-encoding this one again to fix the 5.1 audio track that seems to be glitchy.
dhjudasx at 2013-03-26 06:15 CET:
Hopefully getting the fixed up encode shortly.. this torrent will be deleted when it goes up...
Just a head ups...
Just a head ups...
Amazing quality.
Sound/10
Video/11!
Sound/10
Video/11!
dhjudasx at 2013-03-28 20:40 CET:
Please stop downloading this one and start getting the updated/fixed/improved one here
http://thepiratebay.ee/torrent/8311299/The_Dark_Knight_Rises_(2012)_1080p_5.1_BrRip_x264_-_Judas
trying to delete this one
http://thepiratebay.ee/torrent/8311299/The_Dark_Knight_Rises_(2012)_1080p_5.1_BrRip_x264_-_Judas
trying to delete this one
Comments